Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 1, P265-278, January 2023

Laboratory Testing in Transfusion Medicine

Published:October 18, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2022.08.003

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wardrop K.J.
        • Birkenheuer A.
        • Blais M.C.
        • et al.
        Update on canine and feline blood donor screening for blood-borne pathogens.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2016; 30: 15-35
        • Roth W.K.
        History and future of nucleic acid amplification technology blood donor testing.
        Transf Med Hemother. 2019; 48: 630-635
        • Giger U.
        • Gelens C.J.
        • Callan M.B.
        • et al.
        An acute hemolytic transfusion reaction caused by dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1 incompatibility in a previously sensitized dog.
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995; 206: 1358-1362
        • Melzer K.J.
        • Wardrop K.J.
        • Hale A.S.
        • et al.
        A hemolytic transfusion reaction due to DEA 4 alloantibodies in a dog.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2003; 17: 931-933
        • Goulet S.
        • Blais M.C.
        Characterization of anti-Dal alloantibodies following sensitization of two Dal-negative dogs.
        Vet Pathol. 2018; 55: 108-115
        • Lee J.H.
        • Giger U.
        • Kim H.Y.
        Kai 1 and Kai 2: characterization of these dog erythrocyte antigens by monoclonal antibodies.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0179932
        • Goulet S.
        • Giger U.
        • Arsenault J.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and mode of inheritance of the Dal blood group in dogs in North America.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2017; 31: 751-758
        • Conti-Patara A.
        • Ngwenyama T.R.
        • Martin L.G.
        • et al.
        Dal-induced red blood cell incompatibilities in a Doberman Pinscher with von Willebrand factor deficiency and ehrlichiosis.
        J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2021; 31: 274-278
        • Auer L.
        • Bell K.
        The AB blood group system of cats.
        Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1981; 12: 287-297
        • Auer L.
        • Bell K.
        Transfusion reactions in cats due to AB blood group incompatibility.
        Res Vet Sci. 1983; 35: 145-152
        • Weinstein N.M.
        • Blais M.C.
        • Harris K.
        • et al.
        A newly recognized blood group in domestic shorthair cats: the Mik red cell antigen.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2007; 21: 287-292
        • Binvel M.
        • Arsenault J.
        • Depre B.
        • et al.
        Identification of 5 novel feline erythrocyte antigens based on the presence of naturally occurring alloantibodies.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2021; 35: 234-244
        • Proverbio D.
        • Perego R.
        • Baggiani L.
        • et al.
        A card agglutination test for dog erythrocyte antigen 1 (DEA 1) blood typing in donor dogs: determining an appropriate cutoff to detect positivity using a receiver operating characteristic curve.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2019; 48: 630-635
        • Seth M.
        • Jackson K.V.
        • Winzelberg S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of gel column, card, and cartridge techniques for dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1 blood typing.
        Am J Vet Res. 2012; 73: 213-219
        • Seth M.
        • Jackson K.V.
        • Giger U.
        Comparison of five blood typing methods for the feline AB blood group system.
        Am J Vet Res. 2011; 72: 203-209
        • Acierno M.M.
        • Raj K.
        • Giger U.
        DEA 1 expression on dog erythrocytes analyzed by immunochromatographic and flow cytometric techniques.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2014; 28: 592-598
        • Odunayo A.
        • Garraway K.
        • Rohrbach B.W.
        • et al.
        Incidence of incompatible crossmatch results in dogs admitted to the veterinary teaching hospital with no history of prior red blood cell transfusion.
        J Am Vet Assoc. 2017; 250: 303-308
        • Zaremba R.
        • Brooks A.
        • Thomovsky E.
        Transfusion medicine: an update on antigens, antibodies and serologic testing in dogs and cats.
        Top Companion Anim Med. 2019; 34: 36-46
        • Davidow E.B.
        • Blois S.L.
        • Goy-Thollot I.
        • et al.
        Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement (TRACS) Part 2: prevention and monitoring.
        J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2021; 31: 167-188
        • Wardrop K.J.
        Clinical blood typing and crossmatching.
        in: Brooks M.B. Harr K.E. Seelig D.M. Schalm’s veterinary hematology. 7th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ2022: 964-968
      1. Method 1.9. Reading and grading tube agglutination.
        in: Cohn C.S. Delaney M. Johnson S.T. AABB technical manual. 20th edition. AABB, Bethesda, MD2020
      2. Method 3.7. Detecting antibodies in the presence of rouleaux: Saline replacement.
        in: Cohn C.S. Delaney M. Johnson S.T. AABB technical manual. 20th edition. AABB, Bethesda, MD2020
        • Marshall H.
        • Blois S.L.
        • Abrams-Ogg A.C.G.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of point-of-care crossmatching methods and crossmatch incompatibility in critically ill dogs.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2021; 35: 245-251
        • Caudill M.N.
        • Meichner K.
        • Koenig A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of serum vs EDTA plasma in canine major crossmatch reactions.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2021; 50: 319-326
        • Villarnovo D.
        • Burton S.A.
        • Horney B.S.
        • et al.
        Preliminary evaluation of a gel tube agglutination major crossmatch method in dogs.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2016; 45: 411-416
        • Spada E.
        • Perego R.
        • Vinals Florez L.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of cross-matching method for detection of DEA 7 blood incompatibility.
        J Vet Diagn Invest. 2018; 30: 911-916
        • Davidow E.B.
        • Blois S.L.
        • Goy-Thollot I.
        • et al.
        Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement (TRACS). Part 1: definitions and clinical signs.
        J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2021; 31: 141-166
        • Odunayo A.
        • Nash K.J.
        • Davidow E.B.
        • et al.
        Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) transfusion reaction small animal consensus statement (TRACS). Part 3: diagnosis and treatment.
        J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2021; 31: 189-203
        • Hess J.R.
        • Sparrow R.L.
        • Van Der Meer P.F.
        • et al.
        Red blood cell hemolysis during blood bank storage: using national quality management data to answer basic scientific questions.
        Transfusion. 2009; 49: 2599-2603
        • Patterson J.
        • Rousseau A.
        • Kessler R.J.
        • et al.
        In vitro lysis and acute transfusion reactions with hemolysis caused by inappropriate storage of canine red blood cell products.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2011; 25: 927-933
        • Wang D.
        • Cortés-Puch I.
        • Sun J.
        • et al.
        Transfusion of older stored blood worsens outcomes in canines depending on the presence and severity of pneumonia.
        Transfusion. 2014; 54: 1712-1724
        • Brugué C.B.
        • Ferreira R.R.F.
        • Mesa Sanchez I.
        • et al.
        In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units.
        BMC Vet Res. 2018; 14: 141-148
        • Ferreira R.R.F.
        • Graça R.M.C.
        • Cardoso I.M.
        • et al.
        In vitro hemolysis of stored units of canine packed red blood cells.
        J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2018; 28: 512-517
        • Janatpour K.A.
        • Paglieroni T.G.
        • Crocker V.L.
        • et al.
        Visual assessment of hemolysis in red blood cell units and segments can be deceptive.
        Transfusion. 2004; 44: 984-989
        • Jaeger B.
        • Reems M.
        Visual inspection of stored canine blood for hemolysis compared with measured plasma-free hemoglobin to assess suitability for transfusion.
        Can Vet J. 2018; 59: 1171-1174
        • Kessler R.J.
        • Rankin S.
        • Young S.
        • et al.
        Pseudomonas fluorescens contamination of a feline packed red blood cell unit and studies of canine units.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2010; 39: 29-38
        • Jutkowitz L.A.
        • Rozanski E.A.
        • Moreau J.A.
        • et al.
        Massive transfusion in dogs: 15 cases (1997– 2001).
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002; 220: 1664-1669
        • Lynch A.M.
        • O’Toole T.E.
        • Respess M.
        Transfusion practices for treatment of dogs hospitalized following trauma: 125 cases (2008–2013).
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015; 247: 643-649
        • Hardy J.F.
        • deMoerloose P.
        • Samama C.M.
        The coagulopathy of massive transfusion.
        Vox Sang. 2005; 89: 123-127
        • Levy J.H.
        Massive transfusion coagulopathy.
        Semin Hematol. 2006; 43: 559-563
        • Traore A.N.
        • Delage G.
        • McCombie N.
        • et al.
        Clinical and laboratory practices in investigation of suspected transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection: a survey of Canadian hospitals.
        Vox Sang. 2009; 96: 157-159
        • Roubinian N.H.
        • Looney M.R.
        • Keating S.
        • et al.
        Differentiating pulmonary transfusion reactions using recipient and transfusion factors.
        Transfusion. 2017; 57: 1684-1690
        • Oyama M.A.
        • Rush J.E.
        • Rozanski E.A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration for differentiation of congestive heart failure from primary respiratory tract disease as the cause of respiratory signs in dogs.
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009; 235: 1319-1325
        • Fine D.M.
        • DeClue A.E.
        • Reinero C.R.
        Evaluation of circulating amino terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration in dogs with respiratory distress attributable to congestive heart failure or primary pulmonary disease.
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008; 232: 1674-1679
        • Oyama M.A.
        • Boswood A.
        • Connolly D.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical usefulness of an assay for measurement of circulating n-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide concentration in dogs and cats with heart disease.
        J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013; 243: 71-82
        • Fox P.R.
        • Oyama M.A.
        • Reynolds C.
        • et al.
        Utility of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to distinguish between congestive heart failure and non-cardiac causes of acute dyspnea in cats.
        J Vet Cardiol. 2009; 11: S51-S61
        • Ruaux C.
        • Scollan K.
        • Suchodolski J.S.
        • et al.
        Biologic variability in NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin-I in healthy dogs and dogs with mitral valve degeneration.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2015; 44: 420-430