Review Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 1, P73-87, January 2023

Digital Cytology

Published:October 18, 2022DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Maiolino P.
        • Restucci B.
        • Papparella S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of static telepathology in veterinary diagnostic cytology.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2006; 35: 303-306
        • Webster J.D.
        • Dunstan R.W.
        Whole-slide imaging and automated image analysis: considerations and opportunities in the practice of pathology.
        Vet Pathol. 2014; 51: 211-223
        • Thrall M.
        • Pantanowitz L.
        • Khalbuss W.
        Telecytology: clinical applications, current challenges, and future benefits.
        J Pathol Inform. 2011; 2: 51
        • Aeffner F.
        • Blanchard T.W.
        • Keel M.K.
        • et al.
        Whole-slide imaging: the future is here.
        Vet Pathol. 2018; 55: 488-489
        • Donnelly A.D.
        • Mukherjee M.S.
        • Lyden E.R.
        • et al.
        Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens.
        J Pathol Inform. 2013; 4: 38
        • Evered A.
        • Dudding N.
        Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
        Cytopathology. 2011; 22: 82-87
        • Bonsembiante F.
        • Martini V.
        • Bonfanti U.
        • et al.
        Cytomorphological description and intra-observer agreement in whole slide imaging for canine lymphoma.
        Vet J. 2018; 236: 96-101
        • Bonsembiante F.
        • Bonfanti U.
        • Cian F.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic validation of a whole-slide imaging scanner in cytological samples: diagnostic accuracy and comparison with light microscopy.
        Vet Pathol. 2019; 56: 429-434
        • Bertram C.A.
        • Gurtner C.
        • Dettwiler M.
        • et al.
        validation of digital microscopy compared with light microscopy for the diagnosis of canine cutaneous tumors.
        Vet Pathol. 2018; 55: 490-500
        • Blanchet C.J.K.
        • Fish E.J.
        • Miller A.G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of region of interest digital cytology compared to light microscopy for veterinary medicine.
        Vet Pathol. 2019; 56: 725-731
        • Pantanowitz L.
        Digital images and the future of digital pathology.
        J Pathol Inform. 2010; 1: 15
        • Lin O.
        Telecytology for rapid on-site evaluation: current status.
        J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2018; 7: 1-6
        • Brooker A.J.
        • Krimer P.M.
        • Meichner K.
        • et al.
        Impact of photographer experience and number of images on telecytology accuracy.
        Vet Clin Pathol. 2019; 48: 419-424
        • Yamashiro K.
        • Taira K.
        • Matsubayashi S.
        • et al.
        Comparison between a traditional single still image and a multiframe video image along the z-axis of the same microscopic field of interest in cytology: Which does contribute to telecytology?.
        Diagn Cytopathol. 2009; 37: 727-731
        • Murphy B.D.
        • Davidson M.W.
        Fundamentals of light Microscopy and electronic imaging.
        2nd edition. Wiley & Sons, inc., Hoboken, New Jersey2012: 1-19
        • Ernst Keller H.
        • Watkins S.
        Contrast enhancement in light microscopy.
        Curr Protoc Cytom. 2013; 63: 2.1.1-2.1.9